What we're reading now

SGB – Lead and Local Counsel for Patent Cases in the Western District of Texas (Austin and Waco)

Slayden Grubert Beard is a trusted partner of clients and law firms involved in patent infringement cases in our home forum, the Waco and Austin Divisions of the Western District of Texas.  We are experienced lead and local counsel, and we welcome the opportunity to help you navigate the unique procedures and personalities of our district.

Below are links to standing orders and local procedures we’ve found helpful in the initial stages of litigation in the Waco and Austin Divisions.  We look forward to working with you the next time you find yourselves in the Western District of Texas.   

Current Standing Order regarding Waco Trials (trials are currently proceeding as scheduled)

Current Standing Order regarding Trials in Other Divisions of the Western District of Texas (all trials are continued through March 31, 2021)

Local Rules for the Western District of Texas

Judge Albright’s Order Governing Proceedings for Patent Cases (OGP Version 3.2) (includes default infringement/invalidity contention deadlines, interim protective order, default discovery limits, and claim construction procedures)

Pro Hac Vice and ECF Registration Forms

Judge Albright’s Notice of Readiness (Waco)

Judge Albright’s Form Scheduling Order (Waco)

Judge Albright’s Microsoft Excel Scheduling Date Calculator Tool (Waco)

Judge Albright’s Patent Case FAQs (Waco) (includes telephonic hearing procedures for discovery disputes)

Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC Welcomes Accomplished Patent Trial Lawyer

Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC (SGB) is pleased to announce that Joseph (Joey) Gray has joined the Firm as a shareholder.

Mr. Gray is an accomplished trial lawyer and patent attorney with over 15 years of experience trying bench and jury trials in district courts around the country, at the International Trade Commission, and before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board.  He advises in all areas of intellectual property for clients of all shapes and sizes, from individual inventors and emerging companies to multinational corporations.

Mr. Gray joins SGB from Baker Botts LLP, where he was an intellectual property partner for the past seven years.  “I am delighted to be joining SGB’s first-rate team of IP lawyers, including several former Baker Botts colleagues I highly respect,” said Mr. Gray.  “SGB has found a way to practice IP law in a way that is different and better than large law firms – including being more nimble, flexible, and responsive to client needs.  I’m excited to introduce my clients to the extraordinary talent at SGB, and I look forward to continuing to provide exemplary client service at a substantially reduced cost.”

Mr. Gray earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Texas at Austin, where he studied in the Engineering Honors Program and graduated with highest honors from the McCombs School of Business.  Mr. Gray also attended The University of Hawaii (Manoa) and The University of Edinburgh (Scotland) during his undergraduate studies. He subsequently attended Stanford Law School, where he graduated with distinction and served as managing editor of the Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance.

After completing a clerkship with the Hon. William Wayne Justice of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Mr. Gray began his legal career with Vinson & Elkins before joining Baker Botts in 2011.  Among other awards, Mr. Gray was recognized in The Best Lawyers in America from 2013-2020 and as a Texas Super Lawyer-Rising Star from 2011-2019.

Increasingly Faster Ex Parte Appeals Before the USPTO – New Fast Track Appeal Program

by Jerry F. Suva

Historically, patent practitioners regarded ex parte appeals of examiner decisions as very slow. These appeals, submitted to the Patent Trials and Appeal Board (PTAB) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), often required several years of waiting for a decision.

However, under Director Andrei Iancu, the decision time for an ex parte appeal decision has dropped dramatically. Once all briefs and answers have been submitted, the PTAB now issues a decision in an average time of 13-15 months. However, earlier this month the USPTO launched a new effort called the “Fast-Track Appeals Pilot Program” (FTAPP) which will make ex parte appeals even faster.

Nuts and Bolts of the FTAPP

The FTAPP is remarkably simple—pay an additional $400 fee in conjunction with an electronic petition, and the PTAB will issue a decision on your ex parte appeal in six months. The FTAPP parallels the “Track One” prosecution program, wherein one can also “cut in line” by paying an extra fee for expedited prosecution. The FTAPP is limited to 125 applications per quarter for the next year. As of July 24, twenty (20) applications have been accepted into the FTAPP, so plenty of opportunities still exist to take advantage of this expedited appeals process. Appellants who have previously filed a pending ex parte appeal can enter the FTAPP by simply paying the fee and filing the electronic petition. Oral hearings are available under the FTAPP but rescheduling such hearings is not flexible.

“6 Months”—But After the Reply Brief

The six-month window begins after filing of the Appeal Brief, the Examiner’s Answer, and the Reply Brief (if any). Obviously, the Appellant can reduce the time for the Appeal Brief or the Reply Brief by quickly filing these briefs. However, M.P.E.P. § 1207.02 states that the “examiner should furnish [the Examiner’s Answer] within 2 months” (emphasis added). The examiner is thus not required to provide the Examiner’s Answer within any given length of time. Anecdotally, examiners will wait as long as six months to provide their answer.

The six-month window for the decision under the FTAPP should thus be compared with the present average pendency for the decision. The average pendency varies over time and depends upon particular art units, but is roughly 15 months. Practitioners can view up-to-date USPTO pendency statistics here.

Thus, the FTAPP will save the average appellant about nine months.

Appeals are Now Even More Appealing

The USPTO promotes the FTAPP as suitable for emerging technologies or fast-to-market inventions. However, consider filing under the FTAPP by default for every ex parte appeal. The $400 fee is a small incremental cost when compared to the other USPTO fees and the necessary attorney fees for an appeal. Moreover, strongly consider filing an FTAPP petition for any already-filed ex parte appeal.

The FTAPP makes ex parte appeals an even more viable option when compared to other tactics for rejected claims, such as making an amendment and filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE). Assuming efficiencies such as one month to draft an Appeal Brief, two months waiting for an Examiner’s Answer, and one month to draft a Reply Brief, the ex parte appeal process could be completed in ten months. A ten-month time span for an appeal compares favorably with the time for an RCE. Compared to an RCE, the ex parte appeal need not further limit the claims, receives substantive review by three PTAB judges, and limits potentially multiple subsequent office actions.

Potential patentees and patent practitioners should reconsider any traditional expectations in view of the FTAPP, and revisit ex parte appeals as a viable tactic in obtaining patent protection.

Slayden Grubert Beard Launches New Website Following 5-Year Anniversary

Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC (“SGB”) is pleased to announce the launch of its new website.  A lot has changed since we opened the SGB doors and launched our first website in 2015.  For example, SGB has grown from its three founders (Bruce W. Slayden II, Andreas Grubert, and R. William Beard Jr.) to twelve attorneys, one U.S. patent agent/German attorney, and three paralegals. 

Since 2015, SGB has:

  • Helped its clients obtain 1,282 U.S. patents
  • Represented clients in 33 cases in the following U.S. district courts:
    • Western District of Texas
    • Southern District of Texas
    • Eastern District of Texas
    • Delaware
    • Northern District of California
    • Eastern District of New York
    • Minnesota
    • Southern District of Florida
    • Northern District of Illinois
    • Arizona
    • Utah
  • Represented clients in the following courts of appeals:
    • Federal Circuit
    • Tenth Circuit
  • Represented clients in fifteen inter partes review and covered business method proceedings before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board

SGB looks forward to many more years of providing excellent service and obtaining favorable results for its clients.